The Violation of Cooperative Principles and Four Maxims in Iranian Psychological Consultation
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper aimed to investigate new ways of understanding non-cooperative attitudes of the speakers and the violation of Cooperative Principle maxims in real Iranian psychological consulting session. The data base consists of recorded conversations between a male psychotherapist and his patients during therapy sessions. After analysing their language by means of conversational implicature and the occurrences of the violation of Cooperative Principle, it is concluded that the recognition of conversational implicature is essential for the understanding of the non-cooperative attitudes of the speakers and their violation of one or more Cooperative Principle maxims. Moreover, it was clear that the message people intend to convey is not wholly contained within the words they use, but it is also dependent on how hearers interpreting the message taking into account context and implicated meaning. Finally, there were instances when the purpose was to intentionally miscommunicate within this sophisticated social context. The study has a contribution to the existing knowledge in the area of pragmatics and psychology development.
منابع مشابه
On the Consequences of the Violation of Critical Pedagogy Principles from Iranian EFL Teacher Trainers’ Perspectives
The application of critical pedagogy in educational contexts has received adequate research attention over the last decades. The main focus of this strand of research has, however, been on raising awareness of the educators. Nevertheless, little is known about the consequences of the violation of critical pedagogy principles from EFL teacher trainers’ perspectives. To begin to address this gap ...
متن کاملComedy, Context and Unsaid Meaning: A Case Study in Conversational Implicature
Pragmatics moves away from the word level and sentence level study of language towards the study of language in real-world context and at discourse level whereby two or more participants take part in conversation. There are moments when the speaker explicitly says something but the listener may have other interpretations and inferences from their statements. The aim of this study was to demonst...
متن کاملنقش تغییر موضوع و نقض اصول گرایس توسط متهم در بازجوییهامطالعة موردی در آگاهی تهران بزرگ- نگار مومنی/ سیروس عزیزی
Role of Topic Shift and Violence of Grice Principles in Interrogation: Forensic Linguistics NegarMomeni[1] CyrousAzizi[2] Received:2011/02/04 Accepted:2015/04/06 Abstract Forensic linguistics is a new interdisciplinary branch of applied linguistics and law which utilizes language and linguistic evidence to analyze spoken and written texts technically. It helps police and ju...
متن کاملThe Impact of Perceived Organizational Support through the Mediating Role of Psychological Contract Violation on Work Outcomes
. Perceived organizational support has been raised as work backbone of employee in the organization and the psychological contracts are also a set of promises that top managers give to support their employees. Therefore, violation of this contract not only involves depriving organizational support, but also reduces the employee's belongings. The main purpose of this paper was to examine the imp...
متن کاملGRICE INCORPORATED Cooperativity in Spoken Dialogue
The paper presents a consolidated set of principles of cooperative spoken human-machine dialogue which have the potential tor being turned into practically applicable design guidelines. The principles have been validated in three ways. They were established fi'om a Wizard of Oz simulation corpus used to develop the dialogue model for a spoken language dialogue system. Developed independently of...
متن کامل